Liberty without naivety
Lawful thought and disagreement deserve protection. Concrete fraud, coercion, exploitation, violence, and nonconsensual surveillance still require bounded safeguards.
About the project
A public-interest research site for the cognitive domain.
OutrightAttack.com connects technical systems to the human rights they can affect—without treating every influence attempt as mind control or every safeguard as censorship.
MISSION
Make cognitive power visible, testable, and governable.
The project studies how AI, neurotechnology, surveillance, ranking systems, predictive models, synthetic identities, and influence operations can alter the conditions under which people perceive, deliberate, decide, and relate.
Its central public output is a Cognitive Liberty Charter: a revisable governance proposal for mental sovereignty, mental privacy, meaningful consent, identity continuity, transparent synthetic interaction, algorithmic choice, and due process.
Defense without militarization
Cognitive resilience should strengthen civilian institutions, research, education, privacy, and accountable process—not turn ordinary political disagreement into a security target.
Urgency without certainty theater
Unknowns, contested evidence, negative findings, and failed campaigns are part of the record. Technical possibility is not presented as inevitable social control.
Publication without surveillance
The default build uses no advertising, analytics, tracking pixels, external fonts, or third-party JavaScript. Participation data stays on the host.
TECHNICAL POSTURE
Small, auditable, dependency-free.
The release uses PHP 8.1+, semantic HTML, local CSS, and vanilla JavaScript. Research files remain readable Markdown. There is no database requirement, build pipeline, package manager, external API, CDN, or third-party runtime library.
CONTENT POSTURE
Preserve sources; disclose limits.
The first release includes fourteen owner-supplied research dossiers. Each public page carries an evidence label, a source record, an integrity hash, and a warning that time-sensitive claims require reverification.
Read the evidence method →