Evidence and working analysis
Twenty dossiers connect technical systems to mental privacy, due process, visible governance, human agency, and public accountability.
How aggregate forecasting can support humanitarian planning while targeted risk scoring creates bias, feedback loops, due-process failures, and preemptive repression.
A policy architecture for protecting the inner forum, limiting mental-state inference, preserving due process, and creating enforceable remedies.
The foundational case for mental sovereignty, the distinction between thought and conduct, and legal protections for neural and inferred mental data.
A public address and speaking framework translating mental privacy, optimization without conscience, and algorithmic due process into a civic case.
How surveillance, arbitrary classification, information restriction, coercive force, and blocked participation can narrow thought, damage trust, and intensify social stress.
No research dossiers match that filter.
